Article – Animal Safety is Our Responsibility
By- James Adam
Animals are an important part of our lives, whether they are companions like dogs and cats or teammates like horses. But it’s important to know that animal owners can be held responsible if that animal injures someone. Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is the intentional infliction by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal, for purposes other than self-defence or survival.
Get tips to write professional articles
Animal cruelty facts are so many that they can easily amaze us. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific gains, such as killing animals for food or for their fur; opinions differ about the extent of cruelty associated with a given method of slaughter. Cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering for personal amusement, as in zoosadism. Animal testing laws concerning animal cruelty are designed to prevent needless cruelty. “Millions of animals, mostly frogs, are killed every year expressly for educational use, in the same way, millions of animals are confined for factory farming and chicken farming. This action leaves the impression that animal lives can be wasted if this benefits humanity. Divergent approaches to such laws occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. Pet Cruelty is not the same thing as disrespect towards animals. In broad terms, there are three conceptual approaches to the issue of cruelty to animals. The animal welfare league holds that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals for human purposes, such as food, clothing, entertainment, and research, but that it should be done in a way that minimizes unnecessary pain and suffering, sometimes referred to as “humane” treatment. Utilitarian advocates argue from the position of costs and benefits and vary in their conclusions as to the allowable treatment of animals. Some utilitarians argue for a weaker approach which is closer to the animal welfare position, whereas others argue for a position that is similar to animal rights. Animal rights theorists criticize these positions, arguing that the words “unnecessary” and “humane” are subject to widely differing interpretations and that animals have basic rights. They say that the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property and to ensure that they are never used as commodities. There are periods of mass extinction of species and times when new species appear. All things come into being and pass away. We are responsible for animals on our own. We can be held responsible for injuries or other damage caused by your dog, cat, horse, cow, reptile, etc. We can be held responsible for Our animal if these conditions are met: the animal is in our care, for example, when we take it for a walk, bring it to a friend’s house or are in your own home the animal is in the care of a third party, for example, our neighbour is watching it while we are away our animal is lost or has escaped. Even if you’re not the owner of an animal was in your care or control when it caused damage, both you and the owner can be held responsible. For example, you could be responsible for the animal’s acts if you rent a horse for an outing, transport animals or operate a livestock exchange. Generally, if you own or are taking care of an animal, you are responsible for any damage the animal causes. Even if you take precautions, like posting signs warning that your dog is dangerous, or putting a leash on it, you are still responsible as the owner or custodian of the animal. the victim’s fault: the victim could be found at fault if he did not take basic, reasonable precautions when dealing with an unpredictable animal (by provoking an animal, trying to scare it, not taking necessary precautions, etc.) the fault of a third party an event or series of events considered to be an act of God (beyond human control) or fortuitous (unpredictable) A dog owner is responsible for injuries caused by the dog even if the owner had no control over the animal when the incident happened.
Download this Article in PDF
Want to Read More:-
14. Cloning Has Lot of Benefits
20. Failure is good for Success